Hmmm. Interesting. I see the general idea of what you're doing. We'll take a
look at adding that functionality for synchronous gets. We also may end up declaring that
the performance penalty for our expected use case is small enough that we'll live with
it as it is. Thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4121388#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...