OK, I probably need to re-run/debug Andrew's test to better understand what happens
here, anyway:
- yes, I would expect the same behavior with AS 4.2.x
- so, considering the final changes for this issue, I understand in case of oneway
invocations we would need to set the new property in the provided Client before calling
the remoting code or set the unmarshaller (perhaps another one doing nothing) even if we
call invokeOneway, right?
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4185059#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...