I just ran into the same issue. I found the answer here, which is good, but I'm
curious if this is a bug? I'm working from the O'Reilly EJB 3.0 book (5th ed) and
the introductory example shows the persistence unit's name being specified.
"Should" that have worked?
Thanks!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4141869#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...