Alejandro Guizar [
http://community.jboss.org/people/alex.guizar%40jboss.com] replied to
the discussion
"Is the simple fork/join with async execution paths broken in jBPM 4.0"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/547948#547948
--------------------------------------------------------------
Can anyone please explain +why+ one needs to put async continuations
on each activity within a fork in order for things to advance automatically?
Good
question. I've filed
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBPM-2888 JBPM-2888 to investigate
this problem. I'm guessing it is related to
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBPM-2787
JBPM-2787: process instances getting stuck in a fork, for jBPM3. There, setting the async
attribute +in the join node+ is part of the solution. What strikes me as odd reading the
comments in this thread is that every activity following the fork needs to be made
asynchronous in jBPM4.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/547948#547948]
Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]