Hello Again, I've been slogging along with my Spring JBPM integration and hope to be able to contribute a working demo app in the near future. Along the way I have many questions, of which here is one: - Why are the tables all defined in the default schema instead of in a jbpm specific schema? Would that make it dependent on the DB? The way my app is set up, using Oracle, I define groups of related app functionality in separate schemas. The tables in the hbx xml files are defined as table="SCHEMA.TABLE". As it stands with jBPM, my default root schema has to absorb all of the JBPM tables, or I have to edit each of the hibernate files and strip them out of the jar... which I could do I guess. Was this done because other DBs dont use this syntax, or for another reason, or for no reason in particular? Thanks! dan View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993226#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...