User development,
A new message was posted in the thread "HornetQ RA integration":
http://community.jboss.org/message/532613#532613
Author : Jeff Mesnil
Profile :
http://community.jboss.org/people/jmesnil
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
vickyk wrote:
Using the xa resource with transaction context does not make any sense as there is no tx
propagation, in such cases no-tx resource could be used.
I agree. Unfortunately,
this is to pass TCK tests and some of them uses the same ConnectionFactory with
transactions and others don't.
I don't understand how the Session.recovery would be called in tests where there is
no tx propagation, if the TX is not being present in the usecases then i don't see
recovery being called , therefore the TX recovey mechanism will not call
Session::recovery.
The recovery will come in picture in case of TX only.
I may need to understand the TCK testcase to provide more details.
I was talking
about JMS Session.recover(), not XAResource.recover().
Session.recover() is used to recover message acknowledgementswhen the JMS session is not
transacted. Sorry for the confusion.
thanks for the clarification,
jeff
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page:
http://community.jboss.org/message/532613#532613