User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Upgrade from JBPM3 to JBPM4 woes": http://community.jboss.org/message/524861#524861 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- You are always free to make this choice. What does make me wonder though is how you asses the risk of something different but existint (jbpm 3 vs 4) in relation to something none existing. I've seen in my previous job that often the choice was made to role something ourselves (themselves I should say since I never supported it). Some time later it almost always backfired in multiple ways. And migrating from jBPM3 to another BPM solution almost certainly as difficult as migrating to jBPM4. I understand I think... Well I understand it is not a knock against jBPM4, but in line with my previous remark, I do not understand. Why not 'just' continue with jBPM 3, maybe even extend it? A Basic FSM is indeed not difficult to develop, but adding all kinds of things around it, makes it more and more complex (have experience in this area with a workflow and forms solution)   So I am truly honestly, openly interested in the ++/+/0/-/-- lists/ Balanced scrore card/SWOT-analysis leading to this without wanting to lure you back :-)   Cheers,   Ronald -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/524861#524861