"That should prevent phantom reads, shouldn't it?" -- Sorry, I meant dirty
reads. The way we're using the cache makes phantom reads not a problem. And read
committed prevents dirty reads. So I think we're in good shape--I have a
single-data-item-per-node version of the cache up and running now and am in the process of
testing it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4221438#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...