| public class ZeroOneType extends CharBooleanType { | | protected final String getTrueString() { | return "1"; | } | protected final String getFalseString() { | return "0"; | } | public String getName() { return "zero_one"; } | | } | Yep, I'm currently trying out something like the above with a @Type(type=foo.ZeroOneType) annotation. Lets see how it works out. I've come to the conclusion with all converters etc that my domain objects have some traces of legacy-db-reverse-engineering. I'm now working towards making them more natural (booleans are booleans, enums are enums)... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4070751#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...