Hi Claudia,
anonymous wrote :
| I'm pleased to hear that you made the multiplex server invoker more robust
|
If you're interested in the multiplex transport for its ability to support callbacks
with clients behind firewalls, you ought to take a look at the new bisocket transport.
The original motivation for multiplex was to satisfy the need of the JBoss Messaging group
for a transport that could work in the presence of firewalls, but they didn't get
around to using it in their 1.0 release. By the time they got around to the issue for
their 1.2 release, there was some feeling that multiplex wasn't really suitable, so I
wrote bisocket as a replacement. It's conceptually simpler, easier to configure, and
should perform nearly as well as the socket transport, from which it derives most of its
functionality. There's a description in the Remoting documentation.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4032307#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...