Hi, I'm running Seam 2.0.0.B1 and I have the following lines in the console: anonymous wrote : | 16:13:37,004 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.persistence.persistenceProvider | 16:13:37,051 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.core.resourceLoader | 16:13:37,067 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.core.expressions | 16:13:37,067 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.web.parameters | 16:13:37,067 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.bpm.businessProcess | 16:13:37,082 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.core.manager | 16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.web.userPrincipal | 16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.web.ajax4jsfFilter | 16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.security.identity | 16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.web.isUserInRole | 16:13:37,098 INFO [Initialization] two components with same name, higher precedence wins: org.jboss.seam.core.resourceBundle Source code that is causing this: org\jboss\seam\bpm\BusinessProcess @Scope(ScopeType.CONVERSATION) | @Name("org.jboss.seam.bpm.businessProcess") | @BypassInterceptors | @Install(dependencies="org.jboss.seam.bpm.jbpm", precedence=BUILT_IN) org\jboss\seam\faces\BusinessProcess @Scope(ScopeType.CONVERSATION) | @Name("org.jboss.seam.bpm.businessProcess") | @BypassInterceptors | @Install(dependencies="org.jboss.seam.bpm.jbpm", precedence=FRAMEWORK, classDependencies="javax.faces.context.FacesContext") Is this supposed to be like that? The latest repository version that I have has the same problem. There is a faces override that is causing the notice to appear. Shouldn't there be a more "clear" way to do the override? PS Excuse me if this question was discussed in a previous thread... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4083029#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...