Re: [jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is ambigious/confusing

archive is fine, but i see this as low priority for the upcoming release. Fixing bugs is much more important right now than naming.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; To: <jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:30 AM Subject: [jbosside-dev] Language used in package UI is ambigious/confusing > > I created this isssue a couple of days ago: > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-448 > > I'm not a native speaker myself, but I do believe that "Package" is too > ambigious to use > as the name for what the *Packaging* plugin produces. > > Could we get some feedback from you guys since the current ui/languague > confuses more than > it explains...and that is not good. > > My suggestion is to use Archive for the thing that is produced by the > Packaging (or even "Archive packaging") builder. > > -- -- > Max Rydahl Andersen > callto://max.rydahl.andersen > > Hibernate > max(a)hibernate.org > http://hibernate.org > > JBoss a division of Red Hat > max.andersen(a)jboss.com > _______________________________________________ > jbosside-dev mailing list > jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev >