>> So, JBoss Tools 3.0.0.GA and JBDS 2.0.0.GA should contain
>> DroolsIDE-5.0.0.GA and
JBoss.org will be Provider name for JBoss
>> Guvnor Tools Plug-in, right?
>>
Anton,
I'm not sure if JBDS 2.0.0 GA will bundle Drools 5 CR1 or Drools 5 GA, but in either
case this
change in the Guvnor tools provider text will be present.
-- John
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:58 +0200, Anton Klimkovich wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> So, JBoss Tools 3.0.0.GA and JBDS 2.0.0.GA should contain
> DroolsIDE-5.0.0.GA and
JBoss.org will be Provider name for JBoss
> Guvnor Tools Plug-in, right?
>
> Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 4:52:18 PM, you wrote:
>
> John> It should be JBoss, a division of Red Hat. That change has been make in
> John> the Drools 5 code base, and we'll pick it up with the next Drools 5
> John> milestone.
>
> John> -- John
>
> John> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:36 +0200, Anton Klimkovich wrote:
>
>>> Should JBoss Guvnor Tools Plug-in have
JBoss.org Provider name or it
>>> it should have JBoss, a Division of Red Hat?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev