>> >> > Cool - which Linux versions ? > > Is xulrunner 1.9 what comes with Fedora 9/10 and Red Hat ? > > No, was used build from mozilla.org http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.9.0.7

> > >> On Mac doesn't work inIFlasher, but works DnD. >> >> > inIFlasher is what we use to mark selection, right ? > > Yes, It's used for drowning blue or red border when we select element.

> I'm curious in what this will solve for us ? > Do we have a jira listing what it will give ? > > It's much more stable, for now we should for example disable attribute direction="rtl", because it's coused crash of vpe. In XR 1.9 also exists additional styles (inline-table, which will be usefully for us). Basically it's engine of firefox 3.0. For now we have founded following issue related to XR1.8 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1719 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1536 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3353 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3969 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3993 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-2571 partially https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1119

> do we need to do all the binary builds ? > > We doesn't need binary build of xulrunner, just create eclipse bundles. Here I describe how to do it http://jjant.com/?q=node/10 > Are there any updatesite avilable with 1.9 like there is for 1.8 ? > > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/

>>> >>> >> No, was used build from mozilla.org >> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.9.0.7 >> >> > So what is in Fedora 9/10 and Red Hat ? > It's will be work on Fedora 9/10 and Red Hat too for x86.

>>> >>> >> Yes, It's used for drowning blue or red border when we select element. >> >> > Again, that sounds like a very big limitation. Any known workarounds > for this ? > Yes, for example select element using div's smth like we draw resizer now.

> Yes, I know it will work if we provide the binary - but I was > wondering if it will work with the xulrunner bundled in Fedora/Red > No, with native fedora/RH XR it's will not work, because XR here has compiled without javaxpcom bridge support.

>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Yes, It's used for drowning blue or red border when we select element. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Again, that sounds like a very big limitation. Any known workarounds >>> for this ? >>> >>> >> Yes, for example select element using div's smth like we draw resizer now. >> >> > Sorry, I don't understand what you mean ? > > Could you illustrate it ? > For example we should highlight some element. 1. We can obtain position of element (X, Y, width, height) 2. Then we add to the end of DOM document 4 span or div elements with style="position:absolute", and X, Y, width and height that allows us around necessary element. 2-en span ________ 1span->|element|-<3-span div with absolute position > /max >

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> Yes, I know it will work if we provide the binary - but I was >>> wondering if it will work with the xulrunner bundled in Fedora/Red >>> >>> >> No, with native fedora/RH XR it's will not work, because XR here has >> compiled without javaxpcom bridge support. >> >> > ooh? thats interesting...any idea why it isn't ? > > /max > In build configuration was added such option ac_add_options --disable-javaxpcom. By default, XULRunner builds the Java-XPCOM bridge, which requires an installed JDK. May be on package build machine JDK hasn't been installed so such option was added.

Howdy ;) Any chance someone can build an x86_64 version? Otherwise I won't be able to use the tools I write. ;) I'd be glad to do any smoke tests you guys would request of me. Unfortunately the machine I used to try to build in the past has been reclaimed in my absence from NYC. I suppose I can even build it myself if one of our Russian friends wants to help me through the process. - Rob

Maxim Areshkau wrote: > Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >>> We have verified work of VPE under xulrunner 1.9 for Mac, Windows >>> and Linux OS. >>> >> Cool - which Linux versions ? >> >> Is xulrunner 1.9 what comes with Fedora 9/10 and Red Hat ? >> > No, was used build from mozilla.org > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/1.9.0.7 > >> >>> Almost all functionality works pretty good. >>> >> "pretty good" - what does that mean ? >> > It should be just good :) > >> >> >> >>> On Mac doesn't work inIFlasher, but works DnD. >>> >> inIFlasher is what we use to mark selection, right ? >> > Yes, It's used for drowning blue or red border when we select element. > >> That is way more important than DnD is it not ? i.e. without >> it you will not have any visual indication of where you are in the >> document. >> >> >>> I think it's will be good to move on xulrunner 1.9 in trunk. >>> >> I'm curious in what this will solve for us ? >> Do we have a jira listing what it will give ? >> > It's much more stable, for now we should for example disable attribute > direction="rtl", because it's coused crash of vpe. > In XR 1.9 also exists additional styles (inline-table, which will be > usefully for us). Basically it's engine of firefox 3.0. > For now we have founded following issue related to XR1.8 > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1719 > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1536 > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3353 > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3969 > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3993 > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-2571 > partially https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-1119 > > >> do we need to do all the binary builds ? >> > We doesn't need binary build of xulrunner, just create eclipse bundles. > Here I describe how to do it http://jjant.com/?q=node/10 > >> Are there any updatesite avilable with 1.9 like there is for 1.8 ? >> > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/ > >> /max >> > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >