3:45 a.m.
Hey guys.
On a workshop at the customer this week we used jBPM 4.1 for a prototype, which we created
on the fly. There are some issues I found on the way. Unofrtunately I don't have the
time now to really investigate all of them, but I wanted to document them at least here!
1. Classloading problems
When you put you EventHandlers, Java delegation classes and/or process variable types in
an EJB3 deployment and redeploy that, jBPM still holds a reference to the old class
definitions, which results in class cast exceptions. My guess is, that this is becasue
EventHandler and such are reused/pooled? So there we might have to discuss, what scenario
we want to support.
2. Invalid types.xml doesn't result in a parsing error
We changed the types mapping and had a small XML error in that file. But this didn't
resulted in a parsing exception, the parsing just stopped at this line and our type
mapping wasn't read (which puzzled us for quite a while ;-)):
| <type name="..." class="..."
variable-class="...EntityVariable"> <!-- end tag was missing! -->
| <type name="serializable" class="serializable"
|
converter="org.jbpm.pvm.internal.type.converter.SerializableToBytesConverter"
| variable-class="org.jbpm.pvm.internal.type.variable.BlobVariable" />
|
Now every Serializable process variable was rejected...
Some issues I maybe just don't know how to do it:
3. Bind e.g. integer value to EventListener field by expression
This didn't work, and I don't know how to get it to work:
| <custom class="de...jbpm.NoopActivity" g="83,61,143,50"
name="xxx">
| <on event="start">
| <event-listener class="de.....SomeEvenetListener">
| <field name="programm"><int
value="#{programm}"/></field>
| </event-listener>
| </on>
| <transition g="14,-11" name="ok" to="b"/>
| </custom>
|
The only possibility with expressions seems to be the which results in a field type
doesn't match problem:
| <custom class="de...jbpm.NoopActivity" g="83,61,143,50"
name="xxx">
| <on event="start">
| <event-listener class="de.....SomeEvenetListener">
| <field name="programm"><object
expr="#{programm}"/></field>
| </event-listener>
| </on>
| <transition g="14,-11" name="ok" to="b"/>
| </custom>
|
Some feature requests:
4. Should be possible to set Subprocess Key by expression
If you start a nw sub process instance, this normally has no special key, thus a key is
created for it. It would be really convinient, if the main process could influence the sub
process key by an expression (e.g.
"#{execution.key}.SubXX.#{someUniqueVariableForIt}). maybe this need some more
thoughts (what in case the key is not unique? ...?), but I think it could get handy in lot
of situations.
And there are some pretty annoying issues in thee GPD, which should be fixed ASAP:
5. Writing in propteries panel is reversed
I am pretty sure this bug is known (as I remeber it right, Koen showed it to me once).
Would be pretty good to fix it anyway.
6. type of is removed by the GPD sometimes
In the workshop the type attribute disappeared a couple of times (but only this
attribute). Don't know when and why exactly, but this is really annoying. This is the
example from the workshop:
| <java class="de....service...Service" g="118,66,112,52"
method="druckeEtikett" name="Etiketten drucken">
| <arg type="long"><object
expr="#{xxx.charge.id}"/></arg>
| <arg type="java.lang.String"><object
expr="#{xxx.ident}"/></arg>
| <arg><object expr="#{xxx.number}"/></arg>
| <transition g="-135,-18" name="to Zustand erfassen"
to="Zustand erfassen"/>
| </java>
|
7. Signavio
by the way, using the Signavio Editor for a already running process results in a lot of
attributes beeing removed when saving with Signavio. It should be somehow the default, to
keep everything, it doesn't know. I think I remember a discussion, that this is pretty
hard to implement. But I think it is crucial for real live use cases. At least for use
cases I have in mind for Business-/-Alignment. But maybe we can discuss that in the next
meeting in Berlin.
And last but not least I started to implement
8. Support EJB3 Entities as process variables
I think this is a pretty important feature, since a lot of projeects start with EJB3
today. Since Tom fixed a bug in the binding code, I think I can go ahead with that. Will
post something as soon I had time to work on it again. If anybody else putting effort into
this, please let me know!
Puh, this is it. Sorry for the long post and not splitting it into several posts, looking
up or creating JIRA-Issues. I really have to work on the book today, just wanted to have
it documented. Maybe some of you can tackle some of the issues, otherwise I will come back
to it as soon there is some time for it.
Cheers
Bernd
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4260868#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...