On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 04:37 -0400, tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com wrote:
eventually one of the obstacles in finding the problem was that the
database returned a list sorted on a timestamp. in most cases that
gives a precise order... unless when the multiple process instances
have a start date within the same millisecond. in that case, the
order becomes random.
does this mean you solved the problem?