[jbpm-dev] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - super-state, scope or something else

hi guys, i'm starting on the super-state. and i'm in doubt if we should keep the name super-state. the only alternative name i can come up with is scope. i like that a bit better. but we also kept 'state' because it would be easier for people that know jbpm 3, even though 'wait' would have been better. so i think the same applies here and hence we should keep super-state but i just wanted to check if there are other opinions out there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231244#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...