don't worry, you'll get used to that.
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 11:17 +0200, Tom Baeyens wrote:
yes. in my branch it is solved. now i'm fighting with svn
switch, maven updates,
merging and the likes to get the changes into trunk.
regards, tom.
Heiko Braun wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 04:37 -0400, tom.baeyens(a)jboss.com wrote:
>> eventually one of the obstacles in finding the problem was that the
>> database returned a list sorted on a timestamp. in most cases that
>> gives a precise order... unless when the multiple process instances
>> have a start date within the same millisecond. in that case, the
>> order becomes random.
>
> does this mean you solved the problem?
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbpm-dev mailing list
> jbpm-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev