[jbpm-dev] [Design of JBoss jBPM] - sar vs ear packaging

Was there any particular reason to switch back to a sar packaging? IMO, the ear packaging fitted our purposes better - I can't think of properties or operations in the JMX console that would not be better placed in the web console instead. More importantly, the ear is portable, at least conceptually. There is evidence in the forums that users are deploying it to every other major appserver, with some minor adaptations, of course. There is a third, albeit more distant, advantage to the ear: the ability to resolve ejb and destination references in web.xml through the ejb-link and message-destination-link elements. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4174740#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...