The message below that Roger passed on from the JCP frustrates me on many
levels. What I hear is that the JCP is changing things out from underneath
us, telling us after the fact, and not really being all that concerned that
they broke things in the process. Only when we call them do they say that
they have alternatives to recover our lost data. The JCP is supposed to be
supporting the expert groups. Instead, they seem to be more concerned with
fixing their website. I know that it is all well intended. But their way of
going about it just isn't acceptable, to me at least.
-Dan
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain(a)sun.com> wrote:
On a related note....
As some of you may know, the EG archive mechanism for our EG emails has
been broken.
In other words, any emails sent to jsr-314-open alias have not been
archived in our well known
familiar place.
I just got off the phone with a JCP individual about this. It appears
that this started happening
around June when the JCP went through a makeover of their site.
The gist of it is that the archiving mechanism has been replaced forum
based mechanism:
http://wiki.jcp.org/boards/index.php?b=jsr-314-public
So any emails sent to jsr-314-public would (or should) show up here.
They also said that the older jsr-314-open messages could be injected into
this forum so we
would not lose anything.
I'm still awaiting specific
details about the new process and what we need to do to rectify the
situation, but it may mean
we change from jsr-314-open to jsr-314-public. I will let you know as soon
as I find out more.
-roger
Ed Burns wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:00:28 +0100, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
> PM> On 18 Sep 2009, at 00:09, Dan Allen wrote:
>
>
>
>> Our first choice for request #1 is to allow all subscribed members of
>>> the jsr-314-open list to post, with moderation of a person's inaugural
post
>>> (webbeans-dev uses this approach, for instance). The second choice would be
>>> to have a separate list open to the community. In either case, both lists
>>> should satisfy request #2.
>>>
>>>
>>
> PM> My preference would be for there to be two email lists, both with PM>
> public, non-password-protected, archives. The first is the EG list. PM> The
> second is the a discussion list. A regular member of the EG can PM> post
> unmoderated to either list. Any subscriber can post to the PM> discussion
> list. If a member of the community is an expert on a PM> particular
> sub-topic, we should pull them into the EG list, using PM> moderation to
> allow their posts through.
>
> I like Pete's suggestion. Dan, is the lack of email gateway the only
> roadblock to using the existing facility on the new
jcp.org site?
>
> Ed
>
>
>
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen