Pageflow/Process documentation improvements
-------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-1194
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1194
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Bug
Components: BPM, Documentation
Reporter: Pete Muir
Assigned To: Pete Muir
The JBPM integration chapter is a constant source of confusion to me.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
transactionListener component should be implemented like Hibernate TMLookup
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-664
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-664
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
Reporter: Gavin King
Assigned To: Gavin King
Fix For: 1.1.5.GA
It would be MUCH better if we did not have an EJB sitting in jboss-seam.jar.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Enable Security for POJO WebServices Endpoint
---------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-2766
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2766
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Security, WS
Affects Versions: 2.0.0.GA
Environment: JBoss 4.2.1GA
Reporter: Srinivasan Raguraman
The @Restrict annotation on Seam component are never applied if they were exposed directly as web service end-point. This is probably because the y are not initialized as seam components, by the web service layer.
Right now the workaround is to have facade layer over seam components and expose them as web service end-point.
The security interceptor on POJO components could be enabled by AOP interception or by some other delegation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Enable Seam Security from external client
-----------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-2332
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2332
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Security
Environment: JavaSE 1.5.0_12, JBoss 4.2.1.GA, JBoss Seam 2.0.0.GA
Reporter: Andreas Eriksson
Attachments: seam-external-client-security.zip
If a Seam component is annotated with the @Restrict annotation and accessed from a POJO (in my case a Quartz job initialized by a servlet) the SecurityInterceptor isn't executed.
The same goes for the Seam Entity Security.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Consider integrating jBPM Identity modulewith Security
-------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-1465
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1465
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: BPM, Security
Reporter: Gavin King
Assigned To: Gavin King
Fix For: 1.3.0.GA
Maybe we can use that as our identity model....
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Integration with JBoss SSO
--------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-1032
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1032
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Security
Affects Versions: 1.2.0.GA
Reporter: Shane Bryzak
Assigned To: Shane Bryzak
We should provide integration of Seam Security with JBoss SSO.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Support X509 certificates
-------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-744
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-744
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Security
Reporter: Gavin King
Assigned To: Shane Bryzak
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2.0.BETA1
I have no idea what these things are, but apparently people want to get them. Supposedly, they are nothing to do with certificates you get when you win something like a spelling competition in primary school. 'Cos if they were, we could have used Norman's PDF stuff. So anyway we can just steal code from Acegi. Then I can tell people "we've got a certificate for X509" in talks, and they will think I know what it is.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
URL authorization
-----------------
Key: JBSEAM-740
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-740
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Security
Reporter: Gavin King
Assigned To: Shane Bryzak
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2.0.BETA1
Probably, for completeness, we need the SecurityFIlter after all, to allow GET/PUT/POST/DELETE authorization for URLs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Need ability to programmatically add Security Permissions
---------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-3103
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-3103
Project: Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Security
Reporter: Samuel Mendenhall
Priority: Minor
"One of the main advantages I can think of having a programmatic approach of adding permissions is that 'drl' file may no longer be required. The rules will be created according to what is described in standard RBAC tables (user-roles-permissions with many-to-many relationships).
Any role/permission added to RBAC tables will not have to be re-defined inside a 'drl' file."
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira