[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-3134?page=comments#action_12418604 ]
Jie Situ commented on JBSEAM-3134:
----------------------------------
As the example shows, the available permission is set by the @Permissions annotation. So
when I show the permission available, I have to internationalized it in the message
properties. And I think that there should be some measures to manage the permission
available except the @Permissions annotation. So that the permission can be dynamic
assigned just as the thread in the forum shane replied.
url:http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=1033...
role and permission should be with an additonal property as full
name
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-3134
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-3134
Project: Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Security
Affects Versions: 2.1.0.BETA1
Reporter: Jie Situ
For development purpose, role is represented as name in English, and permission is
represented as a combination of target and action. But when it's used, the name in
English is not enough. In other language application, usually role and perrmission should
be with a name in native language for display in the view-tier. Althought the property can
set myself in the Entity. But always the role and permssion are managed by the manager
Seam provide. So the Role in security package and the Permission in security.permission
package should be with an addtional property as fullname.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira