[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1643?page=comments#action_12375812 ]
steve tynor commented on JBSEAM-1643:
-------------------------------------
Clarification: "with one overriding the other". By that I mean that the two
definitions would be merged, with the resulting page definition being the union of all the
attributes from both -- e.g., <restrict> markup from pages.xml and
<conversation> and <navigation>, <param>, <action> markup in the
foo.page.xml. In cases where a union doesnt make sense (e.g. if it makes no sense to have
more than one <restrict> clause, Seam could prefer one to the other (e.g. with
foo.page.xml overriding the one from pages.xml - perhaps with a warning to the log).
Complain when user tries to define the same view-id twice in
pages.xml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBSEAM-1643
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1643
Project: JBoss Seam
Issue Type: Feature Request
Affects Versions: 2.0.0.BETA1
Reporter: Matt Drees
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.0.0.GA
If you define two page elements with the same view-id in pages.xml, Seam doesn't
complain at all. This can be confusing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira