Name improvements for flow directives ------------------------------------- Key: SEAMCATCH-22 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/SEAMCATCH-22 Project: Seam Catch Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Core API Affects Versions: Alpha2 Reporter: Dan Allen Assignee: Jason Porter PROCEED -> MARK_HANDLED The directive PROCEED is too vague, and doesn't address the fact that the exception is being marked as handled. Better is to name the directive MARK_HANDLED. This is similar to JTA's setRollbackOnly(). It doesn't perform the action until the frame is complete, but it does mark the eventual action. PROCEED_TO_CAUSE -> DROP_CAUSE The directive PROCEED_TO_CAUSE is problematic on two accounts. First, it has the same problem as PROCEED in that it's too vague. Second, we aren't moving to the cause, we are moving from the cause to the wrapper. So what we are really doing is dropping the cause, hence DROP_CAUSE. Also, this should not mark the exception as handled. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira