[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin...
]
Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-3452:
---------------------------------------
Can the words "LOW Relational Planner Negation" be
rephrased?
The logging comes straight from the Annotation entry. They are likely seldom used on the
client, but if you do the SHOW ANNOTATIONS, you'd see the same information there
broken down in the columns priority, category, annotation, resolution. Ideally this
shouldn't be too verbose though as these logs are already quite large. Can you
suggest an alternative? As I'd be fine with just adding a pipe or other separator.
The word "LOW" used in the context of the criteria not
being pushed down would seem to me to be a possible CRITICAL issue to performance.
Anything could be a potential critical performance issue. It's hard to infer that
this is a query issue - it's even harder to assume that it's a translator design
issue.
> Better highlighting in the query plan when an identified possible issue is seen
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3452
> URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3452
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Query Engine
> Affects Versions: 8.11
> Reporter: Van Halbert
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
>
> Looking a query plan that's printed in the server log, I see the following line:
> "LOW Relational Planner Negation is not supported by source People -
People.Person.id < 2 was not pushed"
Can the words "LOW Relational Planner Negation" be
rephrased?
> The word "LOW" used in the context of the criteria not
being pushed down would seem to me to be a possible CRITICAL issue to performance. And
I'm not sure most users will claim to know what Relational Planner Negation means and
what its implying on an error message.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)