[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3517) The oracle importer should offer an option to use integral types
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins resolved TEIID-3517.
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 8.11
(was: 8.12)
Resolution: Done
added a useIntegralTypes option. This will remove some need for erroneous conversions, but we are conservative with the mapping using the precision - so anything over 18 will map to biginteger.
> The oracle importer should offer an option to use integral types
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3517
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3517
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Quality Risk
> Components: JDBC Connector
> Reporter: Steven Hawkins
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Fix For: 8.11
>
>
> The oracle importer should have an option to map number fields with null or 0 decimal digits to an integral type wide enough to represent the precision.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3511) usage of BITAND function in exists statement results in duplicate rows
by Steven Hawkins (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-3511:
---------------------------------------
As the plans diverge quite a bit, would it be possible possible to provide post execution query plans showing row counts and/or execute with fewer joins to help narrow in on where something is going wrong?
> usage of BITAND function in exists statement results in duplicate rows
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3511
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3511
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 8.9.1
> Reporter: Bram Gadeyne
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Attachments: debugplan_bitand.txt, debugplan_bitand_correct.txt, debugplan_nobitand.txt, debugplan_nobitand_correct.txt
>
>
> I've added the debug plan for the query without the BITAND function and with the BITAND function as an attachment.
> The version without the BITAND function returns 438 rows and the version with BITAND function returns 833 rows. I can see however that rows are duplicated in this second result. I've checked this by executing the version with BITAND statement with select *.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3358) Issues with entity set names
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on TEIID-3358:
------------------------------------------------
Van Halbert <vhalbert(a)redhat.com> changed the Status of [bug 1208515|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208515] from ON_QA to ASSIGNED
> Issues with entity set names
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3358
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3358
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: OData
> Affects Versions: 8.7
> Reporter: Steven Hawkins
> Assignee: Ramesh Reddy
> Labels: Alpha1
> Fix For: 8.7.1.6_2, 8.11, 8.7.3
>
>
> The entity set name used for sql generation should be the fully qualified name. If there is for example two table with the same names in schemas visible to odata, but one of the tables does not have a key, then an ambiguous name exception will be thrown if an odata url is used with only the base table name.
> It also appears that the URI link in the results metadata uses the non-qualified table name, which will have issues in the scenario above.
> We may also need to document or add an additional check for ambiguity as the OData4j findEdmEntitySet logic will return the first matching entity, which is generally against our approach to resolving.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-3510) Move the Embedded examples into separate repository
by Ramesh Reddy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Ramesh Reddy commented on TEIID-3510:
-------------------------------------
1) rename to "teiid-embedded-examples"
2) IMO, we do not need to have a build/kit for this. We are not going to bundle examples with embedded kit. Each example needs to be able to build and run, that you already have.
3) service project should need a better name
4) I do not think we need a "common" module, I prefer the examples be defining all the dependencies inline so that they can be build and run independently. This is why we were suggesting a defining a BOM file, so that you can define that in individual project (does same thing as parent pom doing).
5) remove Teiid specific version number from POM files, this can be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
6) Where is org.teiid.example.JDBCUtils class?
I can help you transfer the ownership to Teiid, find me on IRC we will do that.
> Move the Embedded examples into separate repository
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-3510
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-3510
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Embedded
> Affects Versions: 8.11
> Reporter: Kylin Soong
> Assignee: Kylin Soong
> Fix For: 8.11
>
>
> Create a separate repository for embedded examples, define a maven BOM file for the dependencies management of all examples, and prepare for further refinement like add xa datasources support, add OAuth/REST service, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
10 years, 10 months