[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5798) Mixed PERMISSION GRANTS
by Steven Hawkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins edited comment on TEIID-5798 at 11/25/19 3:58 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
row based security based off of: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/sql-createpolicy.html
would typically look like named policies:
CREATE POLICY name ON table_name FOR operations TO role list USING expression
So this would need to be tracked separately from the current notion of unnamed grants. Teiid has a simple notion of constraint, which is expressed by pg as the WITH CHECK expression - which is valid for both insert and update. We could of course simplify if needed to just allowing WITH CHECK to be specified without an expression if a USING expression is specified.
We would also have support alter/drop policy, and likely would not require the use of an alter ... ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY statement.
Column masking has several pg extensions, but no built-in support. The relevant doc for db2: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEPEK_10.0.0/seca/src/tpc...
It shows a similar paradigm - all masks are named entities - but it also includes some notion of enabled/disabled directly in the statement. Here as well we would likely not carry forward a specific enable/disable. Comparing to current teiid support, DB2 has a limitation of only one mask per column. The Teiid logic will use the order concept to create precedence. Also there is no assignment to roles with the DB2 statement - it would be embedded in the mask expression - case when role ... This however makes it hard to separate the effects of a single role. So we would probably want to add both an ORDER clause and a role assignment TO clause.
So the proposal would be to add a POLICY (which we could possibly also allow the term ROW PERMISSION for consistency in teiid), and MASK concept with CREATE (roughly outlined above), ALTER, and DROP support. These would probably need to be top level db entities (siblings to DataPolicyMetadata) or we would need to introduce a new top level container for all of the security related stuff. Much of the implementation logic would be similar, but there is more work to do in building the row-level expression (could be multiple policies per role), determine what the contraint/check expression should be, and in building the mask (unless we restrict to a single mask per role).
Thoughts?
Unfortunately given the work involved and holidays time coming up, this seems like it could push 13.0 into next year.
was (Author: shawkins):
row based security based off of: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/sql-createpolicy.html
would typically look like named policies:
CREATE POLICY name ON table_name FOR operations TO role list WITH expression
So this would need to be tracked separately from the current notion of unnamed grants. Teiid has a simple notion of constraint, which is express by pg as CHECK expression - which is valid for both insert and update. We could of course simplify if needed to just allowing CHECK to be specified without an expression.
We would also have support alter/drop policy, and likely would not require the use of an alter ... ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY statement.
Column masking has several pg extensions, but no built-in support. The relevant doc for db2: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEPEK_10.0.0/seca/src/tpc...
It shows a similar paradigm - all masks are named entities - but it also includes some notion of enabled/disabled directly in the statement. Here as well we would likely not carry forward a specific enable/disable. Comparing to current teiid support, DB2 has a limitation of only one mask per column. The Teiid logic will use the order concept to create precedence. Also there is no assignment to roles with the DB2 statement - it would be embedded in the mask expression - case when role ... This however makes it hard to separate the effects of a single role. So we would probably want to add both an ORDER clause and a role assignment TO clause.
So the proposal would be to add a POLICY (which we could possibly also allow the term ROW PERMISSION for consistency in teiid), and MASK concept with CREATE (roughly outlined above), ALTER, and DROP support. These would probably need to be top level db entities (siblings to DataPolicyMetadata) or we would need to introduce a new top level container for all of the security related stuff. Much of the implementation logic would be similar, but there is more work to do in building the row-level expression (could be multiple policies per role), determine what the contraint/check expression should be, and in building the mask (unless we restrict to a single mask per role).
Thoughts?
Unfortunately given the work involved and holidays time coming up, this seems like it could push 13.0 into next year.
> Mixed PERMISSION GRANTS
> -----------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-5798
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5798
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Query Engine
> Reporter: Christoph John
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 13.0
>
> Original Estimate: 6 hours
> Remaining Estimate: 6 hours
>
> Hello,
> I am currently trying to set a set of permissions on a table/view. Hence a condition on INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE and an unconditioned SELECT.
> However, it seems that conditioned and unconditioned GRANT statements do not work together.
> {code}
> GRANT INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE ON TABLE "my_nutri_diary.UserDefinedProducts_SRC" CONDITION 'UserDefinedProducts_SRC.fkProfile in (SELECT Account.idProfile FROM Account WHERE Account.uuidUser = LEFT(user(), 36) )' TO odata;
> GRANT SELECT ON TABLE "my_nutri_diary.UserDefinedProducts_SRC" TO odata;
> REVOKE ALTER,EXECUTE ON TABLE "my_nutri_diary.UserDefinedProducts_SRC" FROM odata;
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5798) Mixed PERMISSION GRANTS
by Steven Hawkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins commented on TEIID-5798:
---------------------------------------
row based security based off of: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/sql-createpolicy.html
would typically look like named policies:
CREATE POLICY name ON table_name FOR operations TO role list WITH expression
So this would need to be tracked separately from the current notion of unnamed grants. Teiid has a simple notion of constraint, which is express by pg as CHECK expression - which is valid for both insert and update. We could of course simplify if needed to just allowing CHECK to be specified without an expression.
We would also have support alter/drop policy, and likely would not require the use of an alter ... ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY statement.
Column masking has several pg extensions, but no built-in support. The relevant doc for db2: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEPEK_10.0.0/seca/src/tpc...
It shows a similar paradigm - all masks are named entities - but it also includes some notion of enabled/disabled directly in the statement. Here as well we would likely not carry forward a specific enable/disable. Comparing to current teiid support, DB2 has a limitation of only one mask per column. The Teiid logic will use the order concept to create precedence. Also there is no assignment to roles with the DB2 statement - it would be embedded in the mask expression - case when role ... This however makes it hard to separate the effects of a single role. So we would probably want to add both an ORDER clause and a role assignment TO clause.
So the proposal would be to add a POLICY (which we could possibly also allow the term ROW PERMISSION for consistency in teiid), and MASK concept with CREATE (roughly outlined above), ALTER, and DROP support. These would probably need to be top level db entities (siblings to DataPolicyMetadata) or we would need to introduce a new top level container for all of the security related stuff. Much of the implementation logic would be similar, but there is more work to do in building the row-level expression (could be multiple policies per role), determine what the contraint/check expression should be, and in building the mask (unless we restrict to a single mask per role).
Thoughts?
Unfortunately given the work involved and holidays time coming up, this seems like it could push 13.0 into next year.
> Mixed PERMISSION GRANTS
> -----------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-5798
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5798
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Query Engine
> Reporter: Christoph John
> Assignee: Steven Hawkins
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 13.0
>
> Original Estimate: 6 hours
> Remaining Estimate: 6 hours
>
> Hello,
> I am currently trying to set a set of permissions on a table/view. Hence a condition on INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE and an unconditioned SELECT.
> However, it seems that conditioned and unconditioned GRANT statements do not work together.
> {code}
> GRANT INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE ON TABLE "my_nutri_diary.UserDefinedProducts_SRC" CONDITION 'UserDefinedProducts_SRC.fkProfile in (SELECT Account.idProfile FROM Account WHERE Account.uuidUser = LEFT(user(), 36) )' TO odata;
> GRANT SELECT ON TABLE "my_nutri_diary.UserDefinedProducts_SRC" TO odata;
> REVOKE ALTER,EXECUTE ON TABLE "my_nutri_diary.UserDefinedProducts_SRC" FROM odata;
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5736) General odata function mapping
by Steven Hawkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins reassigned TEIID-5736:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 13.1
(was: 13.0)
Assignee: (was: Steven Hawkins)
> General odata function mapping
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-5736
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5736
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Quality Risk
> Components: OData
> Reporter: Steven Hawkins
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 13.1
>
>
> We are currently mapping procedures and functions defined by ddl to odata functions/actions. The latter is due that the function is represented in our system metadata as a procedure. We need to decide if all functions should be mapped. There's also the notion of a composable function that could be helpful.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-4251) Built in support for Postgres DB as materialization target
by Steven Hawkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-4251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins reassigned TEIID-4251:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 13.1
(was: 13.0)
Assignee: (was: Steven Hawkins)
> Built in support for Postgres DB as materialization target
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-4251
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-4251
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Ramesh Reddy
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 13.1
>
>
> If Postgres database is available along with install or assumed that it is available, then some of the materialization task can be automated, like
> - Creation of a common STATUS table
> - Creation of the materilization targets (create views on dbms)
> - On load, on undeploy and load scripts for all the materialization views
> We need to device a way this to be pluggable, such that based on success of this, we can provide additional support for other sources.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 4 months
[JBoss JIRA] (TEIID-5436) Materialization translator infinispan-hotrod inconsistent state
by Steven Hawkins (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Steven Hawkins updated TEIID-5436:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 13.1
(was: 13.0)
> Materialization translator infinispan-hotrod inconsistent state
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEIID-5436
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/TEIID-5436
> Project: Teiid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDG Connector, Misc. Connectors
> Affects Versions: 8.12.12.6_4
> Reporter: Jan Stastny
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 13.1
>
>
> There is an inconsistency between contents of status table and jdg cache when using infinispan-hotrod translator for materialization.
> For a vdb:
> {code:xml}
> <vdb name="teiid5259" version="1">
> <model name="source">
> <source connection-jndi-name="java:/jdg71HotrodDS" name="source"
> translator-name="tr-override" />
> <metadata type="DDL">
> <![CDATA[
> CREATE FOREIGN TABLE a(id integer NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY) OPTIONS (UPDATABLE TRUE, "teiid_ispn:cache" '${primary.cache.name}');
> CREATE FOREIGN TABLE a_stage(id integer NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY) OPTIONS (UPDATABLE TRUE, "teiid_ispn:cache" '${staging.cache.name}');
> ]]>
> </metadata>
> <metadata type="NATIVE" />
> </model>
> <model name="h2Source">
> <source name="h2Source" translator-name="h2" connection-jndi-name="java:/h2-localhost-9292-ds" />
> </model>
> <model name="View" type="VIRTUAL">
> <metadata type="DDL"><![CDATA[
> CREATE VIEW mat_a(
> id integer NOT NULL
> ) OPTIONS (MATERIALIZED 'TRUE',
> MATERIALIZED_TABLE 'source.a',
> "teiid_rel:MATERIALIZED_STAGE_TABLE" 'source.a_stage',
> "teiid_rel:ALLOW_MATVIEW_MANAGEMENT" 'true',
> "teiid_rel:MATVIEW_STATUS_TABLE" 'h2Source.DB.PUBLIC.DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE',
> "teiid_rel:MATVIEW_AFTER_LOAD_SCRIPT" 'execute source.native(''rename source.a_stage source.a'');',
> "teiid_rel:MATVIEW_BEFORE_LOAD_SCRIPT" 'execute source.native(''truncate source.a_stage'');',
> "teiid_rel:MATVIEW_ONERROR_ACTION" 'THROW_EXCEPTION',
> "teiid_rel:MATVIEW_TTL" 10000
> )
> AS SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 2;
> ]]>
> </metadata>
> </model>
> <translator name="tr-override" type="infinispan-hotrod">
> <property name="SupportsDirectQueryProcedure" value="true"/>
> </translator>
> </vdb>
> {code}
> I can reach a state when:
> # The status table states LOADED for the view
> # The DATA SRC commands inserting into JDG ended (according to teiid-command log)
> # But consecutive query against the view returns lower count (even though having THROW_EXCEPTION in ONERROR_ACTION property)
> See the attached command log:
> {code}
> 13:59:31,679 INFO [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Teiid Timer0) L8MeUp92Tess START USER COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.679 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 txID=null sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess applicationName=internal principal=embedded-async vdbName=teiid5259 vdbVersion=1 sql=execute SYSADMIN.loadMatView('View','mat_a')
> 13:59:31,680 INFO [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker1_QueryProcessorQueue14) SBqGYWW07OB5 END USER COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.68 requestID=SBqGYWW07OB5.0 txID=null sessionID=SBqGYWW07OB5 principal=embedded-async vdbName=teiid5259 vdbVersion=1 finalRowCount=1
> 13:59:31,715 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker1_QueryProcessorQueue16) L8MeUp92Tess START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.715 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=70 executionID=8 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sql=SELECT g_0.NAME, g_0.TARGETSCHEMANAME, g_0.TARGETNAME, g_0.VALID, g_0.LOADSTATE, g_0.UPDATED, g_0.CARDINALITY, g_0.LOADNUMBER FROM h2Source.DB.PUBLIC.DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE AS g_0 WHERE (g_0.VDBNAME = 'teiid5259') AND (g_0.VDBVERSION = 1) AND (g_0.SCHEMANAME = 'View') AND (g_0.NAME = 'mat_a')
> 13:59:31,715 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker1_QueryProcessorQueue16) L8MeUp92Tess SOURCE SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.715 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=70 executionID=8 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sourceCommand=[SELECT g_0."NAME", g_0."TARGETSCHEMANAME", g_0."TARGETNAME", g_0."VALID", g_0."LOADSTATE", g_0."UPDATED", g_0."CARDINALITY", g_0."LOADNUMBER" FROM "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE" AS g_0 WHERE g_0."VDBNAME" = 'teiid5259' AND g_0."VDBVERSION" = 1 AND g_0."SCHEMANAME" = 'View' AND g_0."NAME" = 'mat_a']
> 13:59:31,716 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue17) L8MeUp92Tess END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.716 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=70 executionID=8 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=1071137
> 13:59:31,725 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker1_QueryProcessorQueue18) L8MeUp92Tess START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.725 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=71 executionID=9 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sql=UPDATE h2Source.DB.PUBLIC.DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE SET LoadNumber = 2, LoadState = 'LOADING', valid = FALSE, Updated = {ts'2018-03-01 13:59:31.719'}, Cardinality = -1 WHERE (VDBName = 'teiid5259') AND (VDBVersion = 1) AND (schemaName = 'View') AND (Name = 'mat_a') AND (loadNumber = 1)
> 13:59:31,725 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker1_QueryProcessorQueue18) L8MeUp92Tess SOURCE SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.725 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=71 executionID=9 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sourceCommand=[UPDATE "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE" SET "LOADNUMBER" = 2, "LOADSTATE" = 'LOADING', "VALID" = 0, "UPDATED" = TIMESTAMP '2018-03-01 13:59:31.719', "CARDINALITY" = -1 WHERE "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."VDBNAME" = 'teiid5259' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."VDBVERSION" = 1 AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."SCHEMANAME" = 'View' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."NAME" = 'mat_a' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."LOADNUMBER" = 1]
> 13:59:31,728 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.728 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=71 executionID=9 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=1169356
> 13:59:31,731 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.731 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=73 executionID=10 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sql=EXEC source.native('truncate source.a_stage')
> 13:59:31,845 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue11) uaySHcXyc0o5 END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.845 requestID=uaySHcXyc0o5.0 sourceCommandID=74 executionID=6 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:e status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=uaySHcXyc0o5 principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=3558736
> 13:59:31,847 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue11) uaySHcXyc0o5 START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:31.847 requestID=uaySHcXyc0o5.0 sourceCommandID=79 executionID=11 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:e status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=uaySHcXyc0o5 principal=embedded-async sql=EXEC source.native('rename source.a_stage source.a')
> 13:59:32,040 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.04 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=73 executionID=10 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=0 cpuTime(ns)=1493046
> 13:59:32,047 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.047 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=74 executionID=12 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sql=INSERT INTO source.a_stage (id) VALUES (1)
> 13:59:32,460 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.46 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=74 executionID=12 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=4783162
> 13:59:32,462 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.462 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=74 executionID=13 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sql=INSERT INTO source.a_stage (id) VALUES (2)
> 13:59:32,753 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue11) uaySHcXyc0o5 END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.753 requestID=uaySHcXyc0o5.0 sourceCommandID=79 executionID=11 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:e status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=uaySHcXyc0o5 principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=0 cpuTime(ns)=5021072
> 13:59:32,800 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue11) uaySHcXyc0o5 START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.8 requestID=uaySHcXyc0o5.0 sourceCommandID=80 executionID=14 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:e status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=uaySHcXyc0o5 principal=embedded-async sql=UPDATE h2Source.DB.PUBLIC.DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE SET LoadNumber = 1, LoadState = 'LOADED', valid = TRUE, Updated = {ts'2018-03-01 13:59:32.756'}, Cardinality = 2 WHERE (VDBName = 'teiid5259') AND (VDBVersion = 1) AND (schemaName = 'View') AND (Name = 'mat_a') AND (loadNumber = 1)
> 13:59:32,801 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue11) uaySHcXyc0o5 SOURCE SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.801 requestID=uaySHcXyc0o5.0 sourceCommandID=80 executionID=14 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:e status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=uaySHcXyc0o5 principal=embedded-async sourceCommand=[UPDATE "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE" SET "LOADNUMBER" = 1, "LOADSTATE" = 'LOADED', "VALID" = 1, "UPDATED" = TIMESTAMP '2018-03-01 13:59:32.756', "CARDINALITY" = ? WHERE "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."VDBNAME" = 'teiid5259' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."VDBVERSION" = 1 AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."SCHEMANAME" = 'View' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."NAME" = 'mat_a' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."LOADNUMBER" = 1]
> 13:59:32,804 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue11) uaySHcXyc0o5 END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.804 requestID=uaySHcXyc0o5.0 sourceCommandID=80 executionID=14 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:e status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=uaySHcXyc0o5 principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=31050942
> 13:59:32,806 INFO [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue11) uaySHcXyc0o5 END USER COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:32.806 requestID=uaySHcXyc0o5.0 txID=null sessionID=uaySHcXyc0o5 principal=embedded-async vdbName=teiid5259 vdbVersion=1 finalRowCount=1
> 13:59:33,005 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:33.005 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=74 executionID=13 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=4943881
> 13:59:33,014 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:33.014 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=79 executionID=15 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sql=EXEC source.native('rename source.a_stage source.a')
> 13:59:33,723 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue19) L8MeUp92Tess END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:33.723 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=79 executionID=15 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=0 cpuTime(ns)=4426814
> 13:59:33,731 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue20) L8MeUp92Tess START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:33.731 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=80 executionID=16 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sql=UPDATE h2Source.DB.PUBLIC.DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE SET LoadNumber = 2, LoadState = 'LOADED', valid = TRUE, Updated = {ts'2018-03-01 13:59:33.725'}, Cardinality = 2 WHERE (VDBName = 'teiid5259') AND (VDBVersion = 1) AND (schemaName = 'View') AND (Name = 'mat_a') AND (loadNumber = 2)
> 13:59:33,732 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue20) L8MeUp92Tess SOURCE SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:33.732 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=80 executionID=16 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async sourceCommand=[UPDATE "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE" SET "LOADNUMBER" = 2, "LOADSTATE" = 'LOADED', "VALID" = 1, "UPDATED" = TIMESTAMP '2018-03-01 13:59:33.725', "CARDINALITY" = ? WHERE "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."VDBNAME" = 'teiid5259' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."VDBVERSION" = 1 AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."SCHEMANAME" = 'View' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."NAME" = 'mat_a' AND "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE"."LOADNUMBER" = 2]
> 13:59:33,737 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue20) L8MeUp92Tess END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:33.737 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 sourceCommandID=80 executionID=16 txID=TransactionImple < ac, BasicAction: 0:ffff0a2804e2:b3ef2e2:5a97f919:f status: ActionStatus.RUNNING > modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=3747146
> 13:59:33,740 INFO [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue20) L8MeUp92Tess END USER COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:33.74 requestID=L8MeUp92Tess.0 txID=null sessionID=L8MeUp92Tess principal=embedded-async vdbName=teiid5259 vdbVersion=1 finalRowCount=1
> 13:59:35,871 INFO [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (New I/O worker #2) eP8bDNkHEpSG START USER COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:35.871 requestID=eP8bDNkHEpSG.0 txID=null sessionID=eP8bDNkHEpSG applicationName=JDBC principal=user@teiid-security vdbName=teiid5259 vdbVersion=1 sql=SELECT COUNT(*) FROM mat_a
> 13:59:35,877 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue22) eP8bDNkHEpSG START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:35.877 requestID=eP8bDNkHEpSG.0 sourceCommandID=6 executionID=17 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=eP8bDNkHEpSG principal=user@teiid-security sql=SELECT g_0.VALID, g_0.LOADSTATE FROM h2Source.DB.PUBLIC.DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE AS g_0 WHERE (g_0.VDBNAME = 'teiid5259') AND (g_0.VDBVERSION = 1) AND (g_0.SCHEMANAME = 'View') AND (g_0.NAME = 'mat_a')
> 13:59:35,877 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue22) eP8bDNkHEpSG SOURCE SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:35.877 requestID=eP8bDNkHEpSG.0 sourceCommandID=6 executionID=17 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=eP8bDNkHEpSG principal=user@teiid-security sourceCommand=[SELECT g_0."VALID", g_0."LOADSTATE" FROM "DB"."PUBLIC"."DV_MATVIEWS_STATUSTABLE" AS g_0 WHERE g_0."VDBNAME" = 'teiid5259' AND g_0."VDBVERSION" = 1 AND g_0."SCHEMANAME" = 'View' AND g_0."NAME" = 'mat_a']
> 13:59:35,878 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue23) eP8bDNkHEpSG END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:35.878 requestID=eP8bDNkHEpSG.0 sourceCommandID=6 executionID=17 txID=null modelName=h2Source translatorName=h2 sessionID=eP8bDNkHEpSG principal=user@teiid-security finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=904441
> 13:59:35,879 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker2_QueryProcessorQueue24) eP8bDNkHEpSG START DATA SRC COMMAND: startTime=2018-03-01 13:59:35.879 requestID=eP8bDNkHEpSG.0 sourceCommandID=9 executionID=18 txID=null modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=eP8bDNkHEpSG principal=user@teiid-security sql=SELECT g_0.id FROM source.a AS g_0
> 13:59:36,326 DEBUG [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue25) eP8bDNkHEpSG END SRC COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:36.326 requestID=eP8bDNkHEpSG.0 sourceCommandID=9 executionID=18 txID=null modelName=source translatorName=tr-override sessionID=eP8bDNkHEpSG principal=user@teiid-security finalRowCount=1 cpuTime(ns)=32679662
> 13:59:36,384 INFO [org.teiid.COMMAND_LOG] (Worker0_QueryProcessorQueue26) eP8bDNkHEpSG END USER COMMAND: endTime=2018-03-01 13:59:36.384 requestID=eP8bDNkHEpSG.0 txID=null sessionID=eP8bDNkHEpSG principal=user@teiid-security vdbName=teiid5259 vdbVersion=1 finalRowCount=1
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.13.8#713008)
6 years, 4 months