Re: [teiid-users] [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact?

Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:06:10 -0400 From: tejones(a)redhat.com To: rareddy(a)redhat.com CC: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org; teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? How about: "Def-driven VDB" or "d-vdb"? Dynamic VDB seems good too. Ted ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:05:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? Hi, You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes. To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer! I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this, so that we all can refer it by the same name? Thanks Ramesh.. _______________________________________________ teiid-dev mailing list teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev _______________________________________________ teiid-dev mailing list teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev