I don't know whether I can participate in this? If I can, I liked dvdb (dynamic vdb) and would like to have extension as .dvdb instead of .def which will later be converted to .vdb file at runtime. Regards Ram > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:06:10 -0400 > From: tejones(a)redhat.com > To: rareddy(a)redhat.com > CC: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org; teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Subject: Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? > > How about: > > "Def-driven VDB" or "d-vdb"? > > Dynamic VDB seems good too. > > > Ted > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:05:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact? > > Hi, > > You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called > "Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import > metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes. > > To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been > calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are > building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular > VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer! > > I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are > "dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for this, > so that we all can refer it by the same name? > > Thanks > > Ramesh.. > > _______________________________________________ > teiid-dev mailing list > teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev > _______________________________________________ > teiid-dev mailing list > teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev ______________________________________________________________________ One blink is all it takes for the world to change. One click and MSN India helps you catch up Try it!