Re: [weld-dev] Next stable version is 2.4.0
Hi Emily,
the 2.4 release is a continuation of 2.3.x releases.
And you will be able to smoothly upgrade Weld from 2.3 to 2.4.
We simply felt that there will be some more changes included and so
it would be fitting to increase the minor version of project (instead of micro one).
As for WELD-1574, we shall evaluate the efforts needed for backporting this from Weld 3.x
to 2.4x and make a desicion based on that.
As 2.4 is a continuation of 2.3 branch, you have your answer there - no need to backport
it to 2.3.x.
Regards
Matej
----- Original Message -----
From: "Emily Jiang" <EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>
To: "Martin Kouba" <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
Cc: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 12:24:25 PM
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Next stable version is 2.4.0
Hi Martin,
Why not carrying on releasing these jira fixes on 2.3.x branches? Weld-1574
is useful. Do you plan to
WELD-1574 [3] - remove the dependency on Google Guava and reduce the
footprint to Weld 2.3.x?
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>,
"weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org" <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>,
Date: 21/07/2016 10:22
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Next stable version is 2.4.0
Sent by: weld-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
Dne 21.7.2016 v 11:18 Antoine Sabot-Durand napsal(a):
> Hi Martin,
>
> I find all this interesting , especially the back porting of WELD-1574.
> For this last point, does that means that Weld 2.4 will require Java 8?
No, 2.4 will still require Java 7.
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Le jeu. 21 juil. 2016 à 09:58, Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com
> < mailto:mkouba@redhat.com >> a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> we've just created the 2.4 branch on github [1].
>
> Weld 2.4 will remain a CDI 1.2 implementation. We would like to do some
> cleanup (e.g. remove deprecated classes from Weld SE), enhance the API
> and also add some new features. See also the list of issues for
> 2.4.0.CR1 [2].
>
> Weld team is also considering backporting WELD-1574 [3] - remove the
> dependency on Google Guava and reduce the footprint. Let us know what
> you think about this idea.
>
> Martin
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/weld/core/tree/2.4
>
> [2]
> https://issues.jboss.org/projects/WELD/versions/12330683
>
> [3]
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-1574
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org < mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
--
Martin Kouba
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev