Re: [weld-dev] Should you allow starting of an external container from mvn test?

Well today is your lucky day! :) Just commited a Weld SE Arquillian Container 'preview'.. Preview because it's only tested with very basic CDI features. (and has a couple of know 'improvements' code wise) The container starts a SessionScope pr TestCase and a RequestScope pr TestMethod. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/ARQ-54 http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/common/arquillian/trunk/container-weld-emb... I've added a new profile to demo and demo-testng: weld-se Under the weld-se profile only the CDI example works(@Inject Local Stateless Session Bean) mvn test -P weld-se -Dtest=com.acme.cdi.InjectionTestCase If anyone is interested in contributing a bit more complex CDI example/testsuite, it's very welcome! Enjoy and Good luck..... ;) -aslak- 2010/1/5 Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; > > For me, the upcoming weld standalone and embedded JBoss AS test >> implementations are much more compelling and I can't wait to try them out. > > > Without a doubt, I agree that this is the ideal solution. > > -Dan > > -- > Dan Allen > Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action > Registered Linux User #231597 > > http://mojavelinux.com > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction > http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > -- -- Aslak Knutsen; +47 952 38 791; fax +47 22 33 60 24 Kongens gate 14; Boks 805 Sentrum, 0104 Oslo; http://www.conduct.no; mailto:aslak@conduct.no Conduct AS - Professional Open Source Services - Red Hat/JBoss Premier System Integrator - Pentaho Preferred Integration Partner - Atlassian Technology Partner