Re: [webbeans-dev] Questions & clarifications

Are you sure this is true of *static* inner classes? On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:08 AM, <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Just that invoking inner class constructors via reflection is a bit > like > black magic - is this definitely something we want to do... > > -- > Pete Muir > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete > > On 29 Oct 2008, at 15:58, "Gavin King" <gavin(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>>> 3.2.5.1 Declaring a Web Beans constructor >>> >>> >>>> If a simple Web Bean defined using annotations does not explicitly >>>> declare >>>> a constructor using @Initializer, the constructor that accepts no >>>> parameters >>>> is the Web Bean constructor. >>> >>> >>> It is possible to call constructors by reflection on inner >>> classes, but >>> it >>> requires you to rely on the (AFAIK unspecified) behaviour that >>> the inner >>> class instance holds a reference to it's parent instance in the >>> "this$<x>" >>> field, where >>> >>> x = (level-of-nesting - 1) >>> >>> WDYT? >> >> I don't understand what you're suggesting here, Pete. >> >> >> -- >> Gavin King >> gavin.king(a)gmail.com >> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin >> http://hibernate.org >> http://seamframework.org > > _______________________________________________ > webbeans-dev mailing list > webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev > -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org