Re: [webbeans-dev] @NormalScope and @Singleton

Actually @Singleton is a pseudo-scope, since it doesn't satisfy some of the properties that 299 demands of normal scopes. On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Mark Struberg<struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote: > Hi! > > I'm a bit confused about the description of the pseudo scopes in > the latest spec (but it's really late here, so I might missed the > point) > > a) ch 6.3: >> Any scope that is not a normal scope is called a pseudo-scope. > -> @Singleton [1] is per se only @Scope but not @NormalScope, >> The concept of a current instance is not well-defined in the case >> of a pseudo-scope. > -> but instances of @Singleton are pretty well defined, isn't? > > Maybe we should introduce @Passivating and @PseudoScope instead of > @NormalScope and invert the logic? > > b) ch 6.3 >> All pseudo-scopes must be explicitly declared @NormalScope, >> to indicate to the container that no client proxy is required. > vs ch 5.5 >> A contextual reference to a bean with a normal scope ... >> ..not a direct reference... >> Instead, the contextual reference is a client proxy object. > > I'd say pseudo scopes must _not_ declare @NormalScope? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > [1] http://atinject.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javadoc/javax/inject/Singleton.html > > > > > _______________________________________________ > webbeans-dev mailing list > webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev > -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org _______________________________________________ webbeans-dev mailing list webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev