Re: [weld-dev] [jsr-299-eg] About @PostActivate and @PrePassivate
Read EJB 3.1 spec section 12.2.
"In addition to the PostConstruct and PreDestroy callback support
required by the Interceptors specificatoin, interceptors associated
with Stateful Session Beans may define PostActivate and PrePassivate
callbacks."
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi;
@PostActivate and @PrePassivate annotations are defined on the EJB
specification. Those annotations are not defined in the Interceptor
specification. But in CDI specification, chapter 11.1.2 specifices the using
of PRE_PASSIVATE and POST_ACTIVATE interception types.
I think that this is wrong because those annotations must be defined on
ManagedBean with passivating capable not in interceptor class.
For example;
In TCK , it tests
Interceptor interceptor = get Some Interceptors....
interceptor.intercept(InterceptionType.PRE_PASSIVATE or POST_ACTIVATE) is
not meaningful, because interceptors may not define PRE_PASSIVATE or
POST_ACTIVATE methods.
I think that PRE_PASSIVATE and POST_ACTIVATE must be removed from
InterceptionType enum.
--Gurkan
________________________________
Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı!
Haber, Ekonomi, Videolar, Oyunlar hepsi Yahoo! Türkiye'de!
www.yahoo.com.tr
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org