Re: [weld-dev] Weld Probe not initalized during AfterDeploymentValidation

From: "Matej Novotny" <manovotn(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Benjamin Confino" <BENJAMIC(a)uk.ibm.com&gt; Cc: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org, "Tom Evans" <TEVANS(a)uk.ibm.com&gt;, "Emily Jiang" <EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com&gt; Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 12:45:34 PM Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Weld Probe not initalized during AfterDeploymentValidation Actually, in CDI 2.0 you can use @Priority to order observer methods - we could add @Priority(0) to ProbeExtension to ensure it goes first and avoid such possible clashes. As for temporary workaround, you can exclude FacesConfigBeanHolder (the invoked bean) from monitoring to avoid triggering Probe too early. You can do that via `org.jboss.weld.probe.invocationMonitor.excludeType` property as described in Weld docs - http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest-master/en-US/html_single/#con... Matej ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matej Novotny" <manovotn(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Benjamin Confino" <BENJAMIC(a)uk.ibm.com&gt; > Cc: "Emily Jiang" <EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com&gt;, "Tom Evans" <TEVANS(a)uk.ibm.com&gt;, > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 12:15:41 PM > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] Weld Probe not initalized during > AfterDeploymentValidation > > Hi Benjamin, > > CDI spec allows you to inject BM as a method parameter in an extension. > There are only limitations on what methods you can/cannot invoke on BM > object > in certain point during bootstrap (e.g. in certain observer methods). > Those should be covered here - > http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0/cdi-spec.html#beanmanager > In short, their extension seems to be legit. > > What appears to be the case is that AfterDeploymentValidation observer in > MyFaces extension is invoked before one in ProbeExtension (which declares > probe as ready). > There is no standard way in which we could enforce extension ordering, at > least none that I can think of now. But it would make sense to ensure Probe > goes first for it to work properly. > We should try to reproduce this with WFLY and myfaces (I think we only test > mojarra now), it is possible we will be seeing the error as well. > > We'll look into what could be done here and will keep you posted. > > Matej > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Benjamin Confino" <BENJAMIC(a)uk.ibm.com&gt; > > To: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > Cc: "Tom Evans" <TEVANS(a)uk.ibm.com&gt;, "Emily Jiang" <EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com&gt; > > Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 11:31:39 AM > > Subject: [weld-dev] Weld Probe not initalized during > > AfterDeploymentValidation > > > > Hello > > > > I've been seeing probe not initalized exceptions that occur on CDI 2.0 > > but > > not CDI 1.2, from what I can see when I debug into the issue the problem > > occurs in > > TransactionalObserverNotifier(ObserverNotifier).notifySyncObservers > > > > In CDI 1.2 I see that the the ArrayList observers has two entries, the > > first > > being ProbeExtension.afterDeploymentValidation > > > > In CDI 2.0 I see four entries, with the first being > > org.apache.myfaces.cdi.config.FacesConfigExtension > > > > And when the afterDeploymentValidation method of FacesConfigExtension is > > called the result is org.jboss.weld.exceptions.IllegalStateException: > > PROBE-000005: Probe is not properly initialized. I've attached a stack > > from > > that error: > > > > > > And the source is on github: > > https://github.com/apache/myfaces/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/apac... > > > > So what are the options here? I don't see anything under > > http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#after_deployment_validation > > saying that you shouldn't invoke beans during after deployment validation > > observers. A bit earlier in 11.5 it says "If other beans are injected > > into > > an extension’s observer methods, non-portable behavior results" but it's > > not > > clear if that refers to using the injected bean manager to lookup a bean. > > > > Presumably if weld-probe needs to run first there's some code to ensure > > it > > does? Do we need to do something to integrate with that code, or avoid > > integrating myfaces? > > > > Regards > > Benjamin > > Unless stated otherwise above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > > 741598. > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > > 3AU > > > > _______________________________________________ > > weld-dev mailing list > > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev