How embarassing, the first time I send a message to this list I accidently send it before
I was done writing, sorry....
---------------
I would maybe call the third case a 'subBean".
I have also run into a problem regarding decorators of 'subBeans'.
The problem is that if I create a decorator of a subBean then I currently have no way of
calling methods in the 'superBean'.
I imagine that the spec may have to be extended with a DI annotation like @SuperBean
(@SuperBean like the @Decorates annotation only it is set to a reference that delegates
calls to the superBean instead of the the next method in the current stack of interceptors
for the subBean).
@SuperBean would be used somelike this this...
public interface BaseType {
public String getDescription();
}
public class SubType extends BaseType {
}
@Decorator public BaseTypeImpl implements BaseType {
public String getDescription() { return "BaseType"; }
}
@Decorator public SubTypeImpl implements SubType {
@SuperBean superBean;
public String getDescription() { return
superBean.getDescription()+":SubType";
}
So, the following expressions should be true...
Bean baseTypeBean= ....;
Bean superTypeBean= ....
baseTypeBean.create().getDescription().equals("BaseType");
superTypeBean.create().getDescription().equals("BaseType:SubType");
--- On Thu, 11/27/08, Gavin King <gavin(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
From: Gavin King <gavin(a)hibernate.org>
Subject: [webbeans-dev] Re: Patterns of reuse
To: "Java Community Process JSR #299 Expert List" <JSR-299-EG(a)jcp.org>,
"Matt Drees" <matt.drees(a)gmail.com>, "Scott Ferguson"
<ferg(a)caucho.com>, "webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org"
<webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Date: Thursday, November 27, 2008, 4:34 PM
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Gavin King <gavin(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
In case 1, it doesn't really make sense to inherit any web beans
metadata to the subtype. In cases 2 and 3, it makes sense to inherit
everything that is not explicitly overridden.
Minor clarification: in case 3, it does not make sense to inherit
binding types - rather, the user should be forced to *explicitly*
redeclare the binding types.
In case 2, binding types are inherited.
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev