On 25 May 2010, at 15:25, Pete Muir wrote:
David, can you concentrate on the testSerializeSFSB.
I am getting to testRemoveEjbIgnored right now.
Ok, I found that the problem is the same as we discussed before - that the current
proxying is too super-class centric. Because non no-interface-view ejbs don't really
have a super class, the ContextBeanInstance is picking one of the two business interfaces
(essentially at random hence why the test sometimes works) as the super class, not
I could hack this so that we make sure all interfaces are added, but I think it is better
to redo the proxies to support using multiple interfaces with Object.class as the
superclass. David, WDYT?
On 24 May 2010, at 19:38, David Allen wrote:
> The last two tests now pass. The first one still fails and will need
> further investigation. There also appears to be yet another failure
> regarding the remove method test for EJBs. I'll take a look at that one
> Am Freitag, den 21.05.2010, 22:57 +0100 schrieb Pete Muir:
>> I've worked through the incontainer test failures we were seeing with Weld,
and I am now down to these locally:
>> All of which are related to serialization of proxies. David is going to take a
look on Sunday at these.
>> If you see other failures locally, please investigate or discuss :-)
>> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev mailing list