On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Marius Bogoevici
On 2010-04-11, at 12:07 AM, Gavin King wrote:
> It's the nature of @Dependent scope that two injection points never
> refer to the same instance, and that circularities are therefore an
Gavin, could you clarify that? From reading your comment, it seems like this use case
implies unbound recursion: Foo injects Bar which in turns injects another instance of
(which is dependent on the first instance of Bar) which injects another instance of Bar
Well, exactly. I mean, that's obvious from the definition of an
@Dependent object, right?
I mean, I don't quite follow what the source of doubt here is. Section
6.4 is *very* explicit on this.