Re: [webbeans-dev] standard name for conversation
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This is the case today (the spec requires this name, the TCK enforces
it).
Ah, good.
On 9 May 2009, at 00:28, Dan Allen wrote:
It would seem very useful if certain components had standard names. For
> instance, it is quite common to consult the conversation object in JSF via
> the EL. I would hate for different implementations to use different names
> making the reference to the conversation non-portable. Would it be
> reasonable to make javax.context.conversation the standard name?
>
> e.g. #{javax.context.conversation.longRunning}
>
> -Dan
>
>
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.0 KB)