Yes, this is a good question - the 299 implementation would need
direct integration with the EJB container for this. (Not the only
place this is needed.)
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Not quite sure how this is supposed to work as everywhere we hold a
reference (proxy) to the EJB, and therefore don't have access to the
instance and therefore can't get hold of the fields. Any pointers?