Re: [weld-dev] Validating for fields that are annotated with both EJB and Inject

Matej, Since @Inject can only work with a qualifier annotation not anything other annotations,

do you think adding a validation criteria to assert that is acceptable? For IDE validation, it is quite limited because a lot of work needs to be done via runtime to figure out whether the 2nd annotation is a CDI qualifier or not. Thanks Emily On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:28 PM Benjamin Confino <BENJAMIC(a)uk.ibm.com <mailto:BENJAMIC@uk.ibm.com>> wrote: Hello weld I had a customer with an issue that I believe occurred because they annotated a field with both @Inject and @EJB. This has given me two questions: 1) Should weld throw an error when a field is annotated with both annotations? 2) If so is the correct way to add something like  if (ij.getAnnotated().isAnnotationPresent(Inject.class) && ij.getAnnotated().isAnnotationPresent(EJB.class)) {     throw ... } to Validator.validateInjectionPointForDefinitionErrors() If so I'm willing to create a pull request, all I'd need is for you to tell me what the error message should say and please point me to which test I should expand to cover this case. Regards Benjamin Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev -- Thanks Emily _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev