Re: [weld-dev] non-visable classes and constructors

Von: Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] non-visable classes and constructors An: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; CC: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de&gt;, "Weld-Dev" <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Datum: Montag, 30. November 2009, 16:04 Huh? The spec does not in any way limit the visibility of the bean constructor. So any visibility must be supported! Sent from my iPhone On Nov 30, 2009, at 6:21 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Yes, the spec makes no statements here I know of. I don't think the TCK should restrict the impl like that anyway, so please file a CDKTCK issue (and say the FQCN, as there are multiple classes called MissileInterceptor). > > Thanks! > > On 30 Nov 2009, at 09:13, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> Gavin, >> >> The spec imho says nothing about the visibility of constructors (e.g. in 3.1.1. and others). >> But the TCK sometimes assumes that even package scoped classes (e.g. MissileInterceptor) which can _not_ be constructed with new must be injected. This feels a bit unnatural to me since there may be a very good reason to hide e.g. private constructors or even whole classes. >> >> Have I overseen something in the spec or do we need to clarify some parts? >> >> Txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> weld-dev mailing list >> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > weld-dev mailing list > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev