Re: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear Push Message Format

in selective push is: ==> variant: iOS + alias: mwessendorf a valid criteria too?

On 28 May 2013 08:51, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > On 28 May 2013 08:48, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > >> TYPO: >> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) + >> deviceType:iPadMini + alias: mwessendorf >> or >> ==> variant: iOS (since a PushAPP _might_ have only one iOS variant) + >> deviceType:iPhone + alias: mwessendorf >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> When doing selective push query, is there any overlap between mobile >>>> variant (which I understand like mobile type which contains certificates) >>>> and device type? >>>> >>> >>> MobileVariant (or call it type) is something like "Android", or "iOS". >>> deviceTypes would be iPad, iPod, iPhone, iWatch :) - or "Android >>> Table", "Andrpid phone", android what not >>> >>> >>> Sure.... ideally there are several variants: >>> - iOS iPhone 5 optimised app in the app store >>> - iOS iPhone 4s optimised app in the app store >>> - iOS iPhone 3 optimised app in the app store >>> - iOS iPad mini optimised app in the app store >>> etc :) >>> >>> But, if there is only one variant, it's totally valid to install an iOS >>> application (from the appstore), on an iPad and an iPhone; >>> >>> >>>> Both aimed at defining categories. >>>> Are those categories defined and fixed in the spec or can they be >>>> extended? >>>> >>> >>> >>> I don't understand categories, here >>> >>> >>>> Can we do a selective push based on mobileType=mobile variant and >>>> alias=john@gmail? >>>> >>> >>> deviceType and alias should be possible; >>> It should be also possible to combine that with a variant >>> >>> ==> variant: iOS (since we have only one iOS varaint) + >>> deviceType:iPadMini + alias: mwessendorf >>> >>> I need to add that to the "Message Format" / spec >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 27 May 2013 23:36, Kris Borchers <kborcher(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> Unifying the APIs shouldn't be hard and could probably happen sooner >>>>> rather than later, IMO. As far as the client goes, if you send extra info >>>>> beyond the version it will just be ignored. Though, it would be better to >>>>> not send the extra info to keep payload small. I guess the issue would be >>>>> on the SPS side and if it can handle receiving and ignoring the extra info. >>>>> >>>>> On May 27, 2013, at 14:06, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Very nice! >>>>> > +1 to discuss later how to "unify" APIs >>>>> > >>>>> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >>>>> >> We /could/ (later?) try to unify the API and simply >>>>> >> *IGNORE* everything besides the version, when talking >>>>> >> to|SimplePush| Variant. >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev