----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Jan de Wit" <edewit(a)redhat.com>
To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 10:47:12 AM
Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] AeroGear project structure and the website
> Makes sense to me. I think the current site does confuse me a
bit... what's
> the difference between Web/JavaScript and Hybrid/Cordova. If we are using
> the same exact code (aerogear.js) then my first thought is just to combine
> that under JavaScript (which I think is your suggestion?). If the code is
> similar, but different between Web and Hybrid then it may be useful to
> clearly define the differences.
It’s a bit complex to explain and on the current site it’s not clear
I agree.
Not all functionality that is in the Javascript project is available in
Cordova and the functionality that is has a different api. So a developer
that will target Cordova will probably end up using both.
The reason that only some parts of the Javascript have been put into
Cordova
is that for those parts it makes sense to use native hardware because of
security, speed or integration, in other cases it doesn’t bring enough
benefit.
Because of the way Cordova plugins work it has not always been
possible to
have the same API although they are close most of the time.
Hope this helps explain things a bit more.
Thanks. This does
help alot
Erik Jan
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev