On Thursday, April 17, 2014, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Apr 17, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Bruno Oliveira
<bruno@abstractj.org<javascript:;>>
wrote:
> So maybe "master secret" and "secret" are a bad naming, once
it's not
> secret? And the correct would be "API key"
+1 to API key, i believe that is what google might use
+1
variantKey (instead if secret)
AppKey (instead of masterSecret)
Sorry for the bad initial naming :-(
>
> Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>> I compare these secrets with the API keys that Google provides for its
>> services. When you go on their Cloud Console , you can check your API
key
>> along with the project number.
>
> --
> abstractj
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile