5:45 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Idel,
>
> these ideas sound extremely awesome, and I agree they are a logic next
> steps on the ground work of your project last year. The WebPush Server
> needs updates too, to be compliant to latest version of the spec, right?
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello community!
>>
>> I'm happy to work with you during the last year! Thank you for the great
>> project! I use it for the pleasured Open Source development when I have
>> free time and I use UPS with my own projects at work.
>>
>> I'm highly motivated to continue my work on WebPush protocol and move it
>> to UPS!
>>
>> Expected results for GSoC 2016 project:
>>
>> - Add WebPush support for Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Safari
>> browsers into UPS.
>> - Integrate AeroGear WebPush server with UnifiedPush Server.
>> - Good test coverage for the new code.
>> - Documentation for all new developments and changes.
>> - Demo application for showing the work of WebPush protocol in
>> action with UPS!
>>
>> I think we could have two demos :)
- pure WebPush, via UPS, to a browser/device
- GCM push, received on WebPush APIs, going through UPS
Agree with you, demo for the usage with browsers should be developed to.
>> -
>>
>>
>> Possible additional tasks which could be done:
>>
>> - Java client for AppServer (similar as a current client for User
>> Agents).
>> - Rewrite java clients with native Java 9 HTTP/2 API.
>>
>> what clients do you mean ?
Current Java client for User Agents (
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-webpush-java-client), which uses Jetty
http2-client right now. And the same client for AppServer.
Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> a few more questions
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Idel,
>>
>> these ideas sound extremely awesome, and I agree they are a logic next
>> steps on the ground work of your project last year. The WebPush Server
>> needs updates too, to be compliant to latest version of the spec, right?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:15 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <
>> idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello community!
>>>
>>> I'm happy to work with you during the last year! Thank you for the great
>>> project! I use it for the pleasured Open Source development when I have
>>> free time and I use UPS with my own projects at work.
>>>
>>> I'm highly motivated to continue my work on WebPush protocol and move it
>>> to UPS!
>>>
>>> Expected results for GSoC 2016 project:
>>>
>>> - Add WebPush support for Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Safari
>>> browsers into UPS.
>>> - Integrate AeroGear WebPush server with UnifiedPush Server.
>>> - Good test coverage for the new code.
>>> - Documentation for all new developments and changes.
>>> - Demo application for showing the work of WebPush protocol in
>>> action with UPS!
>>>
>>> I think we could have two demos :)
>
> - pure WebPush, via UPS, to a browser/device
> - GCM push, received on WebPush APIs, going through UPS
>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>
>>
>> Possible additional tasks which could be done:
>>
>> - Java client for AppServer (similar as a current client for User
>> Agents).
>> - Rewrite java clients with native Java 9 HTTP/2 API.
>>
>> what clients do you mean ?
>
>>
>>> -
>>> - Port webpush-codec directly to Netty. It will simplify WebPush
>>> Server code base and attract other developers to improve the core of the
>>> protocol.
>>>
>>> Glad to see your feedback!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>> --
>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>