Re: [aerogear-dev] Github Protected Branches

same here. I think perhaps we "just" protect master? On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > I feel 50/50 about it, sometimes we have to rebase and fix some mess in > the Git tree. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> >> https://github.com/blog/2051-protected-branches-and-required-status-checks >> >> I think this would be good for us to implement >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > > -- > "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato > - > @abstractj > - > Volenti Nihil Difficile > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev