Re: [aerogear-dev] Sync Data model

On 10 Feb 2014, at 13:41, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > I've done some work on [1] in regards to coming up with a common sync data format for our clients, but I and messed it up [2]. Long story short is that I did not take into account some of client languages features. So here is a new suggestion that will hopefully work with all our client languages: > > public interface SyncObject<T, ID> { So this is a new voc proposal to replace Document. +1 on my side > ID objectId(); +1 objectId will work on iOS (better than just id) > String revision(); > T content(); > } > > What do people think about this? > > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1406 > [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/commit/5e81e5526b5850485eeb83a8f... > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev