On 10 Feb 2014, at 13:41, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > I've done some work on [1] in regards to coming up with a common sync data format for our clients, but I and messed it up [2]. Long story short is that I did not take into account some of client languages features. So here is a new suggestion that will hopefully work with all our client languages: > > public interface SyncObject<T, ID> { So this is a new voc proposal to replace Document. +1 on my side > ID objectId(); +1 objectId will work on iOS (better than just id) > String revision(); > T content(); > } > > What do people think about this? > > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1406 > [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/commit/5e81e5526b5850485eeb83a8f... > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On 02/10/2014 07:41 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote: > Hi, > > I've done some work on [1] in regards to coming up with a common sync data format for our clients, but I and messed it up [2]. Long story short is that I did not take into account some of client languages features. So here is a new suggestion that will hopefully work with all our client languages: > > public interface SyncObject<T, ID> { > ID objectId(); > String revision(); > T content(); > } > What do people think about this? One of the things I'm wondering about is, in the far far future

when our code is told we have the server push^H^H^H^H asynchronously notifying the device of data changes, how will Java know what type the data coming in is? It MAY be useful to have a name space feature in the message.

> > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1406 > [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/commit/5e81e5526b5850485eeb83a8f... > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On 02/10/2014 10:06 AM, Corinne Krych wrote: > On 10 Feb 2014, at 15:49, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> On 02/10/2014 07:41 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've done some work on [1] in regards to coming up with a common sync data format for our clients, but I and messed it up [2]. Long story short is that I did not take into account some of client languages features. So here is a new suggestion that will hopefully work with all our client languages: >>> >>> public interface SyncObject<T, ID> { >>> ID objectId(); >>> String revision(); >>> T content(); >>> } >>> What do people think about this? >> One of the things I'm wondering about is, in the far far future > in the far far future we’ll review the API. 2.0. > > I’ll rather to stick to what we need for M1/M2 to start with... https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1409 ^^ The future which is the second epic in the list.

> > >> when our code is told we have the server push^H^H^H^H asynchronously notifying the device of data changes, how will Java know what type the data coming in is? It MAY be useful to have a name space feature in the message. > > >>> >>> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1406 >>> [2] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/commit/5e81e5526b5850485eeb83a8f... >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev