Re: [aerogear-dev] [aerogear-android-todo]
Comments inline….
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
Howdy
I was reviewing aerogear-android-todo, and noticed some issues
1) Why there is no history on the project? (and consequently, ownership history - passos
contributed code hasn't got attribution)
- even in cases of big rewrites and start-overs, it's nice to keep the commits, as
the history of the incremental changes say a lot about the rationale/train of thought that
lead to the final solution
Really? What's happened? Have we lost our contributions? Weird because at least on
JavaScript, Kris has kept the ownership
https://github.com/aerogear/as-quickstarts/commit/f3fe1aa4274487f71161568...
Why the same is not happening on android? Does anyone need help to do it?
My suggestion is revert it and rebase with our contributions.
2) Why aren't we following the maven project layout, as suggested
by the archetype we are using?
3) Why the API and the example app are intermixed?
- Ideally these should be separate repositories, like the iOS version
-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.6 KB)